In this section of our Colossus Movie Guide for Apocalypse Now, we look at the key shots that help us understand the film.
Cast
- Martin Sheen – U.S. Army Captain Benjamin Willard
- Marlon Brando – Colonel Walter Kurtz
- Robert Duvall – Lieutenant Colonel William “Bill” Kilgore
- Frederic Forrest – Engineman 3rd Class Jay “Chef” Hicks
- Albert Hall – Chief Petty Officer George Phillips
- Sam Bottoms – Gunner’s Mate 3rd Class Lance B. Johnson
- Laurence Fishburne – Gunner’s Mate 3rd Class Tyrone “Mr. Clean” Miller
- Dennis Hopper – an American photojournalist
- G. D. Spradlin – Lieutenant General R. Corman
- Jerry Ziesmer – Jerry Moore
- Harrison Ford – Colonel G. Lucas
- Scott Glenn – Captain Richard M. Colby
Key shots of Apocalypse Now
Willard’s ceiling fan
The juxtaposition of helicopters with a simple bedroom fan in the opening scene of Apocalypse Now sets a compelling precedent for the motifs and themes of the movie, blending the domestic and the warfront, the ordinary and the extraordinary, the serene and the chaotic.
As the film begins, we’re introduced to Captain Willard lying on a hotel bed, the steady whir of a ceiling fan above him. The sound of the fan gradually morphs into the thunderous roar of helicopters—a key motif in the film—and the view outside his window transforms into a war-torn landscape, illustrating the omnipresence of war and its psychological impact on soldiers, even when they’re off the battlefield.
The fan’s spinning blades, visually reminiscent of helicopter rotors, serve as a potent metaphor for Willard’s mental state. It suggests that, although physically removed from the battlefield, he remains psychologically entrenched in the war. His mind continues to rotate around the axis of conflict, trapped in a whirlwind of violence and chaos. This recurring motif of the fan and helicopter noise also speaks to the traumatic echoes of war that reverberate in a soldier’s psyche, disrupting any semblance of peace or normalcy.
In the film’s opening scene, the destruction caused by the helicopters is seen through a god’s eye view, mirroring the detached perspective that the bedroom fan suggests. This sense of distance emphasizes the dehumanizing aspect of modern warfare, where the mechanics of destruction become abstracted, and life and death decisions are made from afar.
The use of the fan noise intertwined with the helicopter sounds hints at the blurred line between reality and hallucination, between sanity and insanity—key themes in Apocalypse Now. Willard’s reality is constantly infiltrated by the sounds and images of war, suggesting that his perception of the world is mediated through his war-torn psyche.
The Playboy Bunny dance
The Playboy Bunny scene in Apocalypse Now is a complex tableau of desire, disillusionment, and the dehumanizing effects of war. The ironic use of guns by the Playboy models and the soldiers’ reactions provide insightful commentary on the intersection of sexuality, violence, and the psychological impact of war.
The women, Playboy models turned USO entertainers, wield guns in their performance—an ironic and jarring juxtaposition of sexual allure and lethal violence. The guns, typically symbols of masculine power and aggression, are employed as props in a sexually charged performance, blurring the lines between attraction and danger, desire and fear. This paradoxical fusion of sexuality and violence reflects the warped realities of the war zone, where conventional distinctions between love and hate, life and death, become blurred.
The women’s use of guns also represents the commodification and objectification of both violence and sexuality in the context of war. The Playboy models are seen not as individuals but as sexual objects, while the guns become stripped of their deadly implications and are treated as mere accessories. This dehumanization and commodification mirror the larger narrative of war in Apocalypse Now, where individuals are reduced to faceless enemies and life itself becomes a disposable commodity.
The soldiers’ reaction to the Playboy Bunny performance is equally revealing. Their frenzied excitement and near-animalistic behavior highlight their desperation for a connection to the “normalcy” they’ve left behind—a world of simple, albeit shallow, pleasures and desires. It underscores the dehumanizing effects of war—an important theme in the film—where the soldiers are deprived of basic human contact and affection, their emotions reduced to primitive urges.
However, the men’s violent desire also underscores their vulnerability. The lack of discipline and control demonstrates the emotional and psychological toll of their situation. The interaction with the Playboy models exposes their raw, unfiltered emotions—an expression of their suppressed fear, longing, and frustration.
Destroying the bridge
The bridge scene in Apocalypse Now presents an apt metaphor for the cyclical and seemingly futile nature of war—an important theme in the movie—underlined by the poignant quote, “Like this bridge, we build it every night, Charlie blows it right back up again just so the generals can say the road’s open.” This scene is rich in symbolic weight, providing critical insights into the military bureaucracy, the demoralizing effects of war, and the blurred boundaries between purpose and absurdity.
The bridge, an important motif in the movie and an essential pathway linking territories, is a traditional symbol of progress and connection. However, in the context of this film, it takes on a much more profound and tragic meaning. The continual destruction and rebuilding of the bridge epitomize the Sisyphean task that the soldiers are engaged in, a never-ending cycle of creation and destruction that underscores the futility and irrationality of war.
The quote itself encapsulates this paradoxical situation. It speaks to the absurdity of the commanding officers insisting on maintaining the semblance of control and progress, while the reality on the ground starkly contrasts these optimistic narratives. This disparity between the bureaucratic ‘war games’ and the harsh realities faced by the soldiers underlines the disconnect between those in power and those directly experiencing the effects of their decisions.
The scene serves as a metaphor for the psychological state of the soldiers, much like the doomed bridge, they’re caught in a ceaseless cycle of hope and despair. The relentless destruction and rebuilding symbolize their attempts to maintain a semblance of order and purpose in the face of chaos and absurdity. Their repetitive, fruitless efforts reflect the psychological toll of war—struggling to find meaning and stability in a world dominated by senseless violence and destruction.
The moment where Willard and his crew drive away as the bridge is destroyed signifies their progression deeper into the heart of darkness—the further they journey, the more they’re confronted with the war’s brutal realities and absurdities. It’s a turning point, marking their transition from the relative order of the military establishment into the chaos of the jungle and their own psychological unraveling.
Kurtz in the shadows
The initial appearance of Colonel Kurtz in Apocalypse Now, shrouded in shadows, is a compelling visual metaphor, imbued with symbolic weight. This meeting between Willard and Kurtz, enveloped in darkness, illuminates key themes within the film, such as the elusive nature of morality, the duality of human nature, and the dehumanizing effects of war.
When Kurtz is first revealed to the audience, his face is almost entirely engulfed in darkness, save for a few fleeting moments where light catches his bald head or prominent features. This choice to keep Kurtz obscured not only builds up an air of mystery and foreboding but also symbolizes the inherent enigma that his character embodies. He exists beyond the dichotomies of good and evil, sane and insane, civilized and savage. His physical obscurity reflects this moral ambiguity, underscoring the movie’s exploration of the thin, blurred line between civilization and savagery.
The shadows surrounding Kurtz could also be interpreted as a visual representation of his psychological state. They hint at the darkness that has engulfed him, the depths of despair and madness that he’s plunged into as a result of his experiences in the war. His obscured appearance symbolizes the internal psychological darkness that all the characters in the film struggle with to varying degrees—a darkness that is a product of the violent and chaotic environment of war.
The meeting between Willard and Kurtz, amid the darkness, marks a significant moment in the narrative. It is the culmination of Willard’s journey, both literal and psychological, into the heart of darkness. This encounter is steeped in anticipation and dread, mirroring Willard’s inner turmoil and uncertainty. Willard comes face-to-face with a man who, like him, has been deeply affected by the war but has chosen to react to it in a drastically different way.
Kurtz, shrouded in shadows, serves as a mirror to Willard, reflecting what he could become if he succumbs to his darkest impulses. It’s a stark reminder of the dehumanizing effect of war, of the thin line that separates a soldier from a savage.
Willard rises from the river
The iconic shot at the end of Apocalypse Now, where Willard rises from the river, is a potent visual summation of his transformative journey and the film’s central themes. The army face paint and the river both serve as recurring motifs throughout the film and reach their symbolic apex in this moment.
The river, a constant presence throughout Willard’s journey, symbolizes the fluid path into the heart of darkness. The river’s murky depths and its course, which meanders deeper into the wilderness, mirror Willard’s gradual descent into moral ambiguity and psychological unrest. When Willard emerges from the river, it is as though he’s being reborn from these dark depths, transformed by his journey and ready to confront Kurtz—and, symbolically, his own inner demons.
Willard’s army face paint is a crucial motif that evolves in significance throughout the film. As discussed in the motifs section, the army face paint initially symbolizes the stripping away of individuality, a surrender to the monolithic identity of the soldier. However, as Willard dons the face paint in the final scenes, it takes on a more profound meaning. It becomes a symbol of his internal transformation, reflecting his immersion into the primitive, savage side of humanity that war so cruelly exposes.
In the scene where Willard rises from the water, his face paint is akin to a tribal warrior’s mask, symbolizing his readiness for the final act of violence: killing Kurtz. It suggests that Willard has crossed the threshold from soldier to warrior, from being a part of a system to a lone, primal entity.
The combination of the river and the army face paint in this shot underscores Willard’s transformation and the culmination of his journey. He emerges from the water—a symbol of life, death, and transformation—donned in the army face paint, a symbol of de-individualization and savagery, to commit an act that encapsulates the film’s exploration of the thin line between civilization and savagery.
The scene stands as a visual metaphor for Willard’s—and by extension, every soldier’s—loss of innocence and humanity in the face of war’s brutality. It underscores the dehumanizing effect of war, the descent into savagery, and the blurred lines between hero and villain, sanity and madness, civilization and wilderness.
What are your thoughts?
Are there more shots you think should be part of the Colossus Movie Guide for Apocalypse Now? Leave your thoughts below and we’ll consider adding them.
Technical reasons may also have played a role in the dark framing of Kurtz in the movie. When Apocalypse Now first came out, I read somewhere that Coppola (who had envisioned Kurtz as a lean mean military type) was upset to find that Brando had become so obese. That’s why he had to be shot in darkness – to conceal what bad physical shape the actor was in. Don’t remember exactly where I read this, or if it was “word of god” from Coppola, himself, but someone wrote it at the time. As I wanted to become a film maker, myself (and did), Reading about such technical problems – and how various Directors overcome them – is something that always fascinates me. I have never forgotten this little tid-bit.
Hey, Jerry! I remember hearing that too. It’s one of those things that reminds us that things not going as planned can lead to very awesome choices. But, I have always wondered about that story just due to the fact that the book the movie is based on, Heart of Darkness, puts a ton of emphasis on light and shadow imagery. It’s pretty much on every page of the book and is one of the main things teachers talk about when they teach the book. I find it hard to imagine that Coppola wouldn’t have intended to include a heavy amount of light/dark in the Kurtz sections, regardless of Brando’s weight.